<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<meta content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div style="font-size:12pt; font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">
<div>I like the BRZ/FRS. Like a go kart on the track only lacking 20-30whp. Very simplistic (no auto dimming rearview and a cloth strap for the shoulder belt holder for example). I love those cars for track duty. It's a pretty good backup car since I can't
afford the 458</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>kieran</div>
<br>
<div id="htc_header">----- Reply message -----<br>
From: "Steve Hirsch" <shirsch@ptc.com><br>
To: "se-r@se-r-list.org" <se-r@se-r-list.org><br>
Subject: what do people here think about "sporty" cars today?<br>
Date: Mon, Jul 28, 2014 4:53 PM</div>
</div>
<br>
<div><font face="Calibri">Since there seems to be a good bit of old-school sensibility here, I think I'll pose this.<br>
<br>
What do people think of today's flavor of "sporty" cars? Personally, I find myself increasingly ambivalent about new cars starting a couple years ago.<br>
<br>
Aesthetically, I think today's cars are pretty ugly. I like some of the styling elements, for example BMW's "flame surfacing" or whatever they call it now, and Mazda's done a nice job with the new 3. But the
</font><font face="Calibri">overall </font><font face="Calibri">profiles and proportions of today's cars are ugly, IMO. All I see are high beltlines, bulgy hoods and blunt noses. I'll admit it
</font><font face="Calibri">works on cars like the Chrysler 300. <br>
But for example:<br>
E90 > F30 3 series<br>
G35 > G37<br>
</font><font face="Calibri">evolution of the Audi A4 and Acura TL<br>
Mercedes C class (not that Id ever buy a Mercedes, but the previous gen C class has a nice profile, IMO.)<br>
<br>
The current models are all uglier than previous models.<br>
<br>
Curious what others think here?<br>
<br>
-steve<br>
<br>
<br>
</font></div>
</body>
</html>